Xanthan gum

Ingrid Greenfield has always been on the far left of the healthy food movement. Her husband, Tom, is an osteopath, naturopath and craniosacral therapist and works with the D’Adamo blood group theories. (The D’Adamo theory says that your ideal diet can be worked out from your blood group – see Tom’s article on the FM site for more detail.)

Ingrid runs Artisan Bread Organic, a bakery in Whitstable in Kent that only uses organic and biodynamic ingredients: whole grain flours freshly milled on a traditonal stone mill every day, revitalised water, natural leaven and Seagreens seaweed to add calcium and nutrients to their breads. On separate millstones they grind naturally gluten-free flours to use in the breads that they make for dairy-free, wheat-free, gluten-free, salt-free, baker’s yeast-free, blood group and geno type diets.

Ingrid has always been vocally opposed to factory made bread, and is especially upset by factory made ‘freefrom’ bread as she maintains that no one whose health is compromised, is ever going to get well by eating manufactured foods that include additives, enzymes and manufacturing aids. She thoroughly disapproves of what I like to think is our more pragmatic approach to freefree…

While I agree that eating the kind of food that Ingrid recommends is the ideal, I just do not believe that the majority of people will be able to get their heads around so dramatic a change to their daily regime, and therefore they will not stick to it. So I prefer to take a more gradualist approach by first removing the worst dietary offenders (dairy or wheat) and then using a pincer action on both the manufacturers and on those with dietary problems: encourage manufacturers to minimise additive use and improve the nutritional profile of their products and encourage allergy/intolerance sufferers to cook more of their own food from scratch using a wider range of natural fresh ingredients and excluding their own particular problem foods. I am not sure that I ever expect the food eaten by the average person on a ‘freefrom’ diet to reach quite the health level of  Ingrid’s breads, but I would hope that they would end up on a reasonably good, at least partially home cooked, healthy and allergen free diet.

Anyhow, one of Ingrid’s biggest bete noires is xanthan gum. She has lectured me on a number of occasions on what a dietary disaster it is and how freefrom breads, such as Genius, are no better for the health of coeliacs and wheat intolerants than eating Mother’s Pride. Ingrid’s basic objection to xanthan gum is that it is a totally unnecessary manufactured additive, but she has also warned that it could, in itself, be an allergen. And now it looks as though she could be right…

Xanthan gum is an exopolysaccaride which is grown or fermented from the bacteria Xanthomonas campestris, the bacteria which cause black rot on cruciferous vegetables such as brassicas (cabbages, cauliflowers etc). The bacteria can be grown on corn, wheat, soya, whey or dairy products. After around four days the fermented ‘broth’ is pasteurised and then dried to make a powder.  When liquid is added to a tiny amount of this powder it forms a thick viscous syrup which is invaluable not only in gluten-free baking (where it largely replaces the ‘gluey’ properties of gluten) but in a wide range of other food products such as salad dressings, ice creams, sauces, frozen foods and drinks. It was discovered by researchers at the USDA and first appeared in food products in the 1960s under the brand name Kelco.

Xanthan gum is both cheap and easy to make and has been a boon to the freefrom industry as it makes the whole business of baking ‘gluten free’ very much easier. However, as its use has spread so, inevitably, have problems arisen.

Whatever you may think about the very wide use of a gum derived from a cabbage-rotting bacterium in food manufacture (if you are Ingrid, not a lot…), if you are highly allergic/intolerant to corn, wheat, soya or dairy you should be concerned about what medium the gum was grown on as it is possible that residual protein fractions from the growing medium may make it through into the gum. The problem here is that, as of now, it is almost impossible to discover what growing medium might have been used for any specific batch of gum and although corn is probably the most common, it is certainly not universal.

A post from Wendy Cohan on celiac.com suggests that xanthan gum itself can cause an allergic reaction which is very similar to a coeliac reaction, except without the pain e.g. bloating, gas and diarrhoea. (She advises using guar gum instead, a more ‘natural product in that it is just the ground starchy part of the guar bean.) However, xanthan gum is an efficient laxative according to a 1993 study from the University of Sheffield, so it might well be responsible for gassy and diarrhoea symptoms. There is also the possibility that, since it is a fermented product, it could affect someone who was super-sensitive to mould.

So, sorry guys….It looks as though that could be another whole range of products off the menu for those who are particularly sensitive. (And if you want to know how sensitive people can be, take a look at Micki Rose’s Truly Gluten Free site…) Indeed, there is an argument to suggest that even if you do not have any overt symptoms (silent coeliac disease, for example), that extra fraction of protein or allergen could be doing you harm even though you are not aware of it.

The way forward? Well, xanthan gum is far too useful a product for freefrom cooks and the freefrom food industry to give up without a struggle. So maybe the first move would be for xanthan gum manufacturers to specify the substrate on which the bacterium was grown so that at least the allergic/intolerant consumer can choose only to eat products using a xanthan gum grown on a base that they can tolerate.

The Truth about Gluten – and the Barrier Plan

It is so long since I have blogged that I have almost forgotten what the blog looks like… All down to the ‘clear up’ after the very successful FreeFrom Food Awards party and presentation on the 17th (see here for the winners and here for Alex’s usual witty report on the party). As anyone who has run functions will know, the ‘tidy up’ process after a ‘do’ always ends up by taking far longer than the organisation that preceded it….

Anyhow, I thought that while I was getting my head back into blogging mode, I would direct all readers with an interest in gluten sensitivity to Micki Rose’s new and revamped sites. As  many of you will be aware, Micki has been working on the theory that it is not just the traditional ‘coeliac’ grains (wheat, barley and rye) which cause problems for those with gluten sensitivity (and for those coeliacs who do not really get better on the traditional ‘coeliac diet’) but all grains – and she does mean all grains.

Using her Truly Gluten Free site as both a research tool and to log her progress, she has been tracking down, in forensic detail, ‘truly’ gluten free foods, supplements and skincare products. Even more importantly she has been developing her theory that the real problem is not so much the gluten but a breakdown in the function of the many ‘barriers’ (gut, skin, blood-brain etc) which should be preventing proteins such as gluten and other potential allergens crossing into the bloodstream and triggering both allergic and autoimmune episodes.

She will, I hope, be precis-ing her theories for us for the FoodsMatter sites in the near future, but rather than waiting for that, why not go directly to her two sites where she explains her theories: the very interactive Truly Gluten Free blog site  where you can also read the experiences of those who have been testing out her protocols for her, and her new site, http://allergyandintolerance.com where she takes you, step by step, through the regime that she has developed.

As yet, I have not had a chance to do more than glance at the latter, but if I know Micki, it will be extremely well thought through, very thoroughly tested and totally user friendly. And, if the feed back from those who have tried the diet is any guide, life-changingly successful! Good reading…

Lactic acid

In a recent blog bemoaning the failure of wine makers to include allergens in the labeling on the bottles, Ruth at  What Allergy? said that she had had a bad reaction (eczema – hard, liquid filled lumps which itched until scratched – on her eye lids, cheeks, forhead and across her back) after drinking a wine which included lactic bacteria as an ingredient. Given that she is highly allergic to all dairy products she assumed that this was the problem.

Well, it sounds as though it should have been – and it might have been – but then again, it might not…. So if you are confused, so are most other people…

Lactic acid bacteria do not, as such, have anything to do with dairy products; they are a bacteria used widely in the food industry to ferment hundreds of foods from yogurt to sauerkraut. The bacteria feed on sugars (they can only grow when some sort of sugars are present) and, as a result of ‘carbohydrate fermentation’, they produce lactic acid. The lactic acid lowers the carbohydrate content, and therefore the pH level, of the food (makes it more acid) to the point where other micro-organisms are unable to grow – thus dramatically increasing the shelf life of the food. This acidity also changes the texture of the food giving it the more intense and sharper flavours of fermented foods. This process is self limiting as the lactic acid bacteria cannot survive once the food becomes too acidic so, at that point, the process stops.

So far so good. The tricky bit, for those with serious sensitivity, is, on what substrate was the bacteria grown? What sugars were they fed on? If it was lactose then will enough lactose still be present in the bacteria to affect someone who is seriously sensitive? Quite possibly, yes. Similarly, if it was grown on a grain-based substrate such corn, will someone who is highly sensitive to corn react? Theoretically, the protein which causes the sensitivity should have been metabolised by the bacteria but, it is becoming clear that those who are seriously sensitive can react to individual molecules in a protein, not just to whole proteins, so someone who is seriously corn sensitive could react to a bacteria cultured on a corn base.

(If you want to know more about the work being done on the allergenicity of molecules, read the brief report of an Allergy Research Foundation meeting on the Foods Matter site.)

So what does a sensitive person do about lactic acid or lactic bacteria when they see it on label? What they should do is to ask on what substrate it was cultured – but you can just imagine what kind of a response you will get at  the Tesco checkout… Even if you ask the manufacturer, it is more than likely that they will not know – although the more allergen aware manufacturers are starting to realise that this kind of information may be important for their hard core customers.

So, as usual if you are super-sensitive, all you can do is to avoid it – just in case. As of now, lactic acid bacteria is usually cultured on a grain base, but this is not always the case and dairy (eg lactose) could have been used. Hopefully, with greater awareness, will come more information so that you can, again, make that much-to-be-wished-for ‘informed choice’.