The benefits of pre-conceptual care

Stork and babyBack in June last year I blogged about the scary statistic (quoted by Dr Marilyn Glanville in a presentation at a McCarrison Society conference) that at least 25% of couples trying to have a baby will have difficulty in conceiving. (Dr Glanville went on to outline pre-conceptual lifestyle and nutritional measures that could dramaticallty reduce this number – see a brief report on her presentation here.)

But although the fertility crisis appears to be getting worse, pre-conceptual care is not new. I recently had the pleasure of meeting Nim Barnes, the redoubtable founder of the charity Foresight which has, since 1978 been helping couples who were having difficulty in conceiving. (Foresight’s programme of  of lifestyle changes and nutritional supplementation is very similar to that recommended by Dr Glanville.)

However, to emphasise how greatly needed these programmes are, Foresight have just completed and published a survey of the experience of those couples who consulted them between 2002 and 2009. I reproduce some of the results below, not so much as a paen of praise to Foresight – although it is – but as scary window on how low the success rates for IVF (In vitro fertilisation),  IUI (Intrauterine insemination) and  ICSI (Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection) are, despite the fairly horrendous procedures the treatments require.

General estimates of the success of IVF and IUI procedures population wide:

IVF & ICSI: Women under 35 – approximately 33% achieve live births but the success rate drops to 1.9% over 45.

IUI: Women under 35 – approximately 16% achieve live births with the success rate dropping to nil over 45.

Foresight’s survey:

Of the 3,411 couples who had tried IVF and subsequently consulted Foresight (between 2002 and 2009), 3,004 had failed and  407 had managed to conceive.

Of the 2,545 couples who had tried IUI and subsequently consulted Foresight (between 2002 and 2009), 2,383 had failed and 162 had managed to conceive.

Of the 1,292 couples who had tried ICSI and subsequently consulted Foresight (between 2002 and 2009), 1,081 had failed and  211 had managed to conceive.

Between them they had suffered 8,939 miscarriages (over one per couple); the national rate for miscarriage is 25%.

Couples who completed the full Foresight programme:

Of the 1,578 couples who completed the full programme , 1,427 (89%) had successful live births including 37 sets of twins and 3 sets of triplets. There were only 42 (2.96%) miscarriages and only 2 babies were premature.

Couples who did part of the Foresight programme but did not complete it:

Of the 518 couples who did part of the programme but did not complete it, 358 (69%) had successful live births including 52 sets of twins. There were 39 (7.53%) miscarriages.

And, of course, we are only talking here about conception and live births – not about the long term health prospects for the children born as a result of IVF treatments. It is generally accepted now that IVF children have up to a 30% higher chance of suffering a wide range of serious, sometimes life-threatening, genetic, digestive, immune  and other congenital disorders than children who were naturally conceived.
BabyWho would seriously want to inflict that sort of risk on their child (quite apart from the increased risks for the mother) when six months of clean living, good eating and nutritional supplementation could ensure you a relatively trouble free pregnancy and a health baby?

 

Crisis in fertility

‘Over the past twenty years, fertility problems have increased dramatically. At least 25% of couples planning a baby will have trouble conceiving, and more and more couples are turning to fertility treatments to help them have a family.’

Where has that come from?  Well, not from some wacky ‘end of the world is nigh’ merchant – but from the first presentation at the McCarrison Society’s conference last month, by the much respected Dr Marilyn Glenville, a former president of the Royal Society of Medicine’s Food and Health Forum and an expert on female hormone problems.

The point of Dr Glenville presentation was that with good preconeptual care (healthy lifestyle and micro-nutritional supplementation) not only of the woman but, more importantly, of the man, for at least three months before any attempt is made to conceive, a couple’s chance of conceiving and having a healthy baby is massively improved. But how horrendous, to quote just a few of Dr Glenville’s figures, that in a survey of 19-year-old young men taken between 2006 an 2010, only 23% had optimal sperm counts, or that 20–25% of German 18–25 year olds now have low sperm counts.

Since Dr Gennvilles’ experience shows that by reducing, or ideally cutting out, the use of alcohol, recreational drugs, cigarettes and caffeine, reducing  exposure to environmental toxins and stress and improving nurtitional profile one can turn an infertile couple into a fertile one, and  significantly reduce the chance of having a low weight or preterm baby – then presumably it follows that it is the use of alcohol, drugs, cigaretees and caffeine, exposure to stress and environmental toxins, and poor nutrition that are largely responsible for this seriously scary situation.

For Dr Glenville’s presentation in more detail, click here – or see her website www.marilynglenville.com

What Dr Genville had to say was scary enough but a later presentation by Dr Enitan Ogundipe from Imperial College brought home the consequences, in terms of the baby’s health, of poor preconceptual care resulting in preterm or low weight babies. She was talking about feeding ‘high risk’ babies (which usually means preterm or low birth weight babies) and explaining that not only is a 37-week-old baby extremely immature in terms of its gastroenterological and immunological development, but it is impossible to reproduce the nutritients that it should be receiving via its mother’s placenta in the womb. So,  apart from all of their other problems, not only are these poor little mites extremely vulnerable to infections and sepsis and therefore bombarded with antibiotics from birth, but they are being semi-starved.

Would you want to wish that on your baby?

For more details of Dr Ogundipe’s presentation see here or for the whole conference, which went on to look at the outcomes of poor nutrition in school and, fascinatingly, in adolescent offenders, see here.

 

NB. Dr Glenville not a lone voice. My old friend, Chinese Medicine practitioner, Barbara Hezelgrave, says that over the last few years she has seen a huge rise in the number of couples coming to her with fertility problems, for which Chinese medicine can be very helpful.

Could ultrasound be lethal?

A typically excitable headline in Wednesday’s  Natural News daily posting read ‘Bill Gates funds technology to destroy your sperm’…

The story was based on a rather less apocolyptic report  on January 30th on the  BBC News Health pages about research originally started in the 1970s but now being carried out by researchers at the University of North Carolina (funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) on using sound waves to reduce sperm counts to levels of infertility.

The  purpose of the trial, carried out successfully on rats, was to find an alternative and easy contraceptive to be used by men. While the convenience seems appealing, the researchers are clear that  ’further studies are required to determine how long the contraceptive effect lasts and if it is safe to use multiple times.’ In other words they need to be sure that the temporary infertility produced by the ultrasound is reversible so that contraception does not turn into sterilisation!

This reminded me of a conversation I had quite recently with Nim Barnes, the lovely and charismatic found of the charity Foresight  that has helped so many apparently infertile couples to conceive and, in due course, have healthy babies. Nim had been at a talk I had given at the McCarrison Society about electrosensitivity and we were discussing the damage that electromagnetic radiation and the transmission of radio waves can cause. She suggested that the relatively frequent ultra sounds checks which are now de rigeur for any pregnant woman, could harm the baby, sometimes even fatally. Especially if the developing child was weak or challenged, relatively strong sound waves being transmitted through the thin protection of the mother’s belly and womb, could disrupt the baby’s heart beat and cause significant damage – maybe even cause a still birth. At the time I was somewhat sceptical but in view of this research, I wonder if she has a point.

If you do have, or know of anyone who has trouble conceiving, Foresight are wonderfully helpful. By chance, a posting came through from Micki Rose’ Pure Health site this morning about another fertility specialist, Sarah Holland, who Micki rates highly – or – as another alternative, acupuncture appears to be very helpful. I know that my good friend Barbara Hezelgrave, in north London, treats a number of apparently infertile couples very successfully.